Tri-ess doesn't claim to represent or serve all possible variations of men who identify in any possible way as feminine, so it's hard for me to imagine criticizing them. Their express purpose is to serve the interests of heterosexual crossdressers. Not bisexual fetish transvestites, and not transitioning transexuals. What is there to criticize in that? Those who criticize them seem to have a problem with diversity – at least diversity as in someone else being different. And those are the same people who squeal loudest in favor of diversity when it means that they gain something from it. Hypocrites.

The TG people who criticize Tri-ess are like a person who hears a house party going on, and demand to be let in. Not because they want to party with these people, but just because they don't want anyone having fun without them. They'd rather tear down someone elses' thing than be satisfied building their own. Why, exactly, would some gender-queer transexual want to hang out with a bunch of straight guys in dresses and their wives? Obvious answer: they don't. They just want to piss in someone else's pool. Shame on them – get a life.

I know many ladies who dress once a month, if that – you are fortunate to be able to dress twice a week. Deciding not to crossdress is a personal decision, but I’ve found that it has only made things worse for me. Learning to accept who I am has been the most freeing for me, even though I know there are others who still don’t fully accept my crossdressing.